J K. Rowling Writes About Her Reasons For Speaking Out On Sex And Gender Issues

J K. Rowling Writes About Her Reasons For Speaking Out On Sex And Gender Issues And, “2 instances fewer” makes absolutely no sense. “Half as many” is a a lot better substitute for “2 occasions fewer”. If you do any computations similar to ratios, you must internally use the total precision of your actual measurements, but your paper will report solely a limited number of digits of precision. Referees are generally individuals of fine will, but completely different referees at a convention could have totally different requirements, so the luck of the draw in referees is a consider acceptance. They have spent considerable time and energy to give you feedback (even if it would not seem to you that they've!), and you ought to be grateful and courteous in return. Do not confuse relative and absolute measurements. For occasion, suppose your medication cures 30% of patients, and the placebo cures 25% of sufferers. You may report that your medicine's treatment fee is .three, the placebo's cure fee is .25, and your medicine's remedy fee is either .05 greater or 20% higher. Just as you have to accurately use “120% extra” versus “a hundred and twenty% as many”, you need to appropriately use “3 times sooner than” versus “3 times as quick as”. A associated, also frequent, confusion is between “3 instances sooner than and 3 occasions as quick as”. You will waste the time of onerous-working reviewers, who provides you with suggestions that you can have obtained in different ways. A rule of thumb is to submit solely if you are proud for the world to affiliate your name with the work, in its current type. You do not want to make obviously apparent that you just spent far more time and house on one reviewer than another. After you submit a paper, do not cease working on it! For instance, you may increase the experiments, improve the implementation, or make different adjustments. If you know of significant criticisms that reviewers would possibly raise, then do not submit the paper. You mustn't submit your paper too early, when it does not reflect properly on you and a submission would waste the group's reviewing assets. You shouldn't submit your paper too late, as a result of then the group is deprived of your scientific insights. When it comes first, it provides readers the impression that your work is quite spinoff. One good approach to automate these duties is by writing a program or creating a script for a construct system corresponding to Make or Ant. If you document and automate these steps, then you possibly can simply regenerate the paper when needed. This is helpful should you re-run experiments or analysis, or if you need to defend your outcomes in opposition to a criticism by different researchers. Even if your paper is accepted, you want the accepted model to be as spectacular as possible. And if the paper is rejected, you need to have a better paper to undergo the subsequent venue. It's true that the suggestions from reviewers is awfully useful to you and can allow you to improve the paper. However, you need to get suggestions from different scientists before submitting for publication. If you leave some steps manual, then you definitely or your colleagues are extremely likely to make a mistake or to be unable to reproduce your outcomes later. Your paper probably contains tables, bibliographies, or different content that's generated from external information. Your paper may also be written in a text formatting language similar to LaTeX. In every of those circumstances, it's essential to run some exterior command to create some of the content material or to create the final PDF. In general, you must err on the aspect of submitting too late quite than too early. That means, you won't litter inboxes with many revisions, and readers can all the time get the latest copy. Be thoughtful to your reviewers, who're spending their time to help you. When readers misunderstand the paper, that's at all times at least partly the creator's fault! Even should you suppose the readers have missed the purpose, you'll find out how your work could be misinterpreted, and eliminating these ambiguities will enhance the paper. Unless your method is a small variation on one other approach, it is often best to defer the related work to the end of the paper.